Stories tagged with "thomas friedman"

DrumBeat II: October 20, 2006

Two reads for you tonight, the first, since we are a blog, and the internet remaining free is rather important for our continuing to make an impact, I bring you David Isenberg discussing Bill Moyers' latest over at WorldChanging...the second I bring you is Tom Friedman's talk from Pop!Tech.
What he's doing is giving a talk titled, "Why this is not your parents' energy crisis." His first reason: the war on terror is fueled by our energy purchases, on both sides of the equation. He gives the example of two stories he saw emerging at the same time in the New York Times: a refusal to expand CAFE fuel standards, and the refusal to cut American agricultural subsidies. He tells a story to tie the two together...

<s>Two</s>Three Quickies: A Map and a Madman (and an Economist!)

First, I wanted to share with you this link at IFenergy which details how "MapMuse has recently introduced interactive mapping of biodiesel fuel stations and E85 fuel stations across the US. There are presently over 650 ethanol 85 fuel stations, and 350 biodiesel fuel stations located on the MapMuse maps." Worth a look.

Also, for you bittorrent fans, Friedman's recent show on the Discovery Channel is available as a .torrent here. (If you are looking for advice on how to get bittorrents, ask in the comments, I'm sure one of us enterprising souls will be happy to direct you towards Azureus or something.)

Update [2006-6-28 17:7:19 by Prof. Goose]: JDH's last three pieces should be read as well.

Friedman calls for a Third Party

We weren't the only ones completely disgusted with the recent political grandstanding over high gasoline prices. Tom Friedman is now calling for a third party, to replace the useless ones we have now, and specifically to deal with energy challenges. It's behind the NY Times paywall, alas, but here's some snippets:


Seriously, there is something really disturbing about the utterly shameless, utterly over-the-top Republican pandering and Democratic point-scoring that have been masquerading as governing in response to this energy crisis. The Republicans are worse, because they control all the levers of power and could move the country if they proposed a serious energy policy -- but won't.

"We used to say the system is broken because it won't respond until there is a crisis," said David Rothkopf, author of "Running the World," a history of U.S. foreign policy. But now it's really broken, "because the system can't even respond to a crisis!"

What to do? I'm hoping for a third party. The situation is ripe for one: America is facing a challenge as big as the cold war -- how we satisfy our long-term energy needs, at reasonable prices, while decreasing our dependence on oil and the bad governments that export it -- and neither major party will offer a solution, because it requires sacrifice today for gain tomorrow.

A Discussion of Friedman's "Gas Pump Geopolitics"

If you haven't read it yet, type "Gas Pump Geopolitics" into Google.  You'll find a reprint of it out there somewhere.  

I will also once again direct you to our Politics of Oil "manifesto" as well.

Thomas Friedman: "Green is the New Red, White, and Blue"

As Jamais Cascio over at WorldChanging (oops!) says: "Thomas Friedman in the New York Times [has been] calling for a "geo-green" agenda, making a move away from fossil fuels a national security issue. It's not because we think he's a brilliant writer so much as he's about as mainstream influential as they come; if Friedman is pushing this, it's going to be debated in the halls of power in Washington."  I hope you're right, Jamais.

Anyway, Jamais points us to a blog that was nice enough to pull some of the quotes from a Friedman article from today's NYT (since it is behind the NYT pay fence), so I will point you there to get a taste.  (link)