Stories tagged with "energy bill"
Bravo for Roscoe! (Roscoe Bartlett Votes No on Energy Bill based on Ethanol Mandate Expansion)
Posted by Nate Hagens on December 6, 2007 - 8:09pm
Topic: Policy/Politics
Tags: energy bill, roscoe bartlett [list all tags]
Roscoe Bartlett seems to always be 2 steps ahead. For several years now he has been speaking, often to only a few Members, on the issues surrounding Peak Oil and our nations need to change our oil intensive way of life. Now, as House leaders are lauding a new Energy Bill (details of which Robert Rapier highlighted here) that will create agricultural jobs and make us depend on the 'Midwest instead of the Middle East", Congressman Bartlett is again ahead of the pack. Knowing that all energy is not created equal, and that biofuels have large costs in terms of energy, water demands, pesticide and fertilizer use, as well as competition for food, the science-trained Congressman voted nay on the Energy bill which included a more than doubling of corn ethanol production over the next decade. He references the National Academy of Science report on The Implications of Biofuel Production on US Water Supplies, and is looking ahead to where we really need to change - efficiency, conservation and new ways of structuring our society. Below the fold is the press release from the Congressmans website.
House to Vote Today on Energy Bill
Posted by Robert Rapier on December 6, 2007 - 5:00pm
Topic: Policy/Politics
Tags: energy bill, energy policy, politics [list all tags]
The House is scheduled to vote today on their latest incarnation of an energy bill:
Energy bill vote pushed to today amid opposition
WASHINGTON -- Congressional Democratic leaders pushed back a vote on an energy bill with a historic increase in fuel economy standards until today, in the face of growing opposition from Senate Republicans, President George W. Bush and even some Democrats.
As outlined by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, the bill would include new requirements for renewable fuels, the elimination of $21 billion tax breaks to oil companies and other sources of revenue, and require electric utilities to generate 15% of their energy from renewable sources by 2020.
A federal energy policy: can it happen here?
Posted by Prof. Goose on August 4, 2007 - 11:12am
Topic: Policy/Politics
Tags: corporate average fuel economy, energy bill, house of representatives, house rules committee, hr 2776, hr 3221, hr 6, oil, peak oil, rps [list all tags]
This is a guest post by Michael Vickerman of RENEW Wisconsin. The original post can be found here and the coverage on the post at EB can be found here. This article is reprinted with the permission of Mr Vickerman.
Petroleum and Natural Gas Watch
by Michael Vickerman, RENEW Wisconsin
July 27, 2007, Vol. 6, Number 9Of all the issue areas that Congress dives into from time to time, none reveals the inability of our legislative branch to fashion an internally consistent national policy quite like energy. The usual items in an energy bill--tax credit extensions, fuel subsidies, fresh regulatory requirements (and loopholes), new rules on offshore drilling, etc.—are designed to reward specific industries and influential constituencies. This year’s energy bill promises to follow that timeworn path left by Congresses of yesteryear.
But an energy bill has to be more than the sum of its subsidies to constitute effective policy. This is especially true as we enter a time of growing resource and environmental limits that threaten to bite us in the collective behind if we don’t curb our profligate consumption of energy.
Updates on the Energy Bills and a New Version of the RPS: There's Still Time to Call Your Member!
Posted by Prof. Goose on August 3, 2007 - 2:52pm
Topic: Alternative energy
Tags: corporate average fuel economy, energy bill, house of representatives, house rules committee, hr 2776, hr 3221, hr 6, oil, peak oil [list all tags]
Two updates:
1. The House Rules Committee has taken testimony on all of the amendments and is prepared, but hasn't yet scheduled a meeting to vote on the Rule for consideration of the energy bills. It is still possible for the House to take up the energy bills later today.
2. About the Udall RPS, the today's revised version can be found here (PDF warning). A couple of notes: Municipal solid waste is not included as an eligible renewable resource. 25 states have municipal solid waste to energy plants. Among these are 12 of the states that have RPS and that include municipal solid waste energy plants in their RPS. MSW is controversial among those who consider themselves among the environmental community. Readers can help their Members by informing them if they have an opinion about the current amendment.
As mentioned in our previous update, Dave Roberts has a nice writeup over at the Gristmill on the national RPS here.
We continue to beseech TOD Readers to inform their Members about their particular recommendations for voting for or against amendments and/or the bill, especially the adopting of a national Renewable Portfolio Standard. The Capitol Hill Switchboard is 202-225-3121--it is a good idea to know your Member's name or your zip code (all nine digits) when calling--Members only want to hear from their constituents.
Our previous posts on the topic (which contain links to legislation and proposed amendments) can be found here and here.
Legislative Updates on The Energy Bills: Today is the Day, Make Your Voice Heard
Posted by Prof. Goose on August 3, 2007 - 9:14am
Topic: Alternative energy
Tags: corporate average fuel economy, energy bill, house of representatives, house rules committee, hr 2776, hr 3221, hr 6, oil, peak oil [list all tags]
This post is a continuation of The Oil Drum's legislative effort to improve the pending House energy bills--the most recent effort can be found here. I can tell you that I have heard from three different staffers about our last thread and its comments, thanking us for our involvement in this legislation. People are being directed to these posts, so please keep them on point and on Realpolitik. Off point comments will be deleted.
TOD Readers are still encouraged to inform their Members about their particular recommendations for voting for or against amendments and/or the bill, especially the adopting of a national Renewable Portfolio Standard. The Capitol Hill Switchboard is 202-225-3121--it is a good idea to know your Member's name or your zip code (all nine digits) when calling--Members only want to hear from their constituents.
Below the fold are links to tables of descriptions of the amendments that have been filed - but NOT YET approved by the Rules Committee for debate and votes tomorrow. Remember, the Energy Tax Bill is H.R. 2776. The General Energy Bill is H.R. 3221. The modified version of the Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS) bill, the old H.R. 969, was filed as an amendment (#96) to H.R. 3221.
UPDATE: CAFE amendments have been withdrawn from consideration.
UPDATE 2: Dave Roberts has a great post on the RPS here at Gristmill.
The House is poised to debate and pass an Energy Bill this week...get your thoughts in...UPDATED
Posted by Prof. Goose on August 1, 2007 - 8:15am
Topic: Policy/Politics
Tags: corporate average fuel economy, energy bill, house of representatives, house rules committee, hr 2776, hr 3221, hr 6, oil, peak oil [list all tags]
UPDATE: Text of the bill H.R. 969 -- T.Udall-Platts RPS can be downloaded using the search engine on the House website: www.house.gov. There is a deadline of 5pm 8/1 for Members to submit amendments to the Rules Committee for the Energy Bill. Any amendment filed MAY differ from the text of bills as introduced.
Amendments to the Energy bill have to be approved by the Rules Committee for floor votes (9 to 5 ratio of Speaker-appointed Democratic to Republican members). It will meet on Thursday. Links to approved amendments will be posted at the Rules Committee website. It can be accessed through the House home page at www.house.gov .
Oil Drum readers are encouraged to peruse recent coverage by CQ Today and EandENews (included below the fold) concerning the contents and status of elements in the bill and voice their reactions to, and analysis of, the legislation in this thread.
Under the fold are links to the actual text of the two bills - an energy bill and a tax bill. These two bills may well be combined into one bill by the House Rules Committee for debate and consideration this Friday.
I can promise you that there will be congressional staffers reading this thread. Therefore please keep it on point, off topic comments will be deleted. I have received emails from staffers who were impressed with our last effort, by the way.
Readers are also encouraged to inform their Members about their recommendations for voting for or against the bill. Two issues of continuing controversy and vote counting are raising CAFÉ standards and adopting a national Renewable Portfolio Standard. The Capitol Hill Switchboard is 202-225-3121--it is a good idea to know your Member's name or your zip code (all nine digits) when calling--Members only want to hear from their constituents.
Ask TOD: Contribute to Legislative Sausage (aka H R 2337, aka The House Energy Bill) Being Made
Posted by Nate Hagens on July 15, 2007 - 9:00am
Topic: Policy/Politics
Tags: commerce and science, energy bill, energy policy reform and revitalization act of 2007, hr 2337, hr 2776, nancy pelosi, renewable energy and energy conservation tax act of 2007, ways and means [list all tags]
Dear TOD readers - we have an opportunity to find out how legislative sausage is made and potentially contribute as a 'diner' with special requests to the Chefs (Members of Congress). If successful we might just get the meal (or at least better seasoning) we want instead of settling for what's dished out.
The Ways and Means and Energy and Commerce and Science Committee Energy Bills are the items on the ala carte menu that Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, Energy and Commerce Chairman John Dingell, Ways and Means Committee Chairman Rangell and Science Committee Chairman Bart Gordon will be negotiating with --- the big missing piece and player is Natural Resources Committee Chairman Nick Rahall and H. R. 2337. The House will be debating the Energy bill this month and we need to get input where we have expertise and identify the good, bad and ugly provisions ideally by next week.
Speaker Pelosi strongly supports H.R. 2337 and there may be other blog reports about its contents. The GOP leadership and US Chamber of Commerce oppose the bill.
In addition to accumulating advice and analysis here, you can recommend your own Representative make specific improvements in the bill with changes to or deletions of specific provisions. Remember nothing new can be added but existing language/provisions can be changed. It's a daunting task. Those with expertise in specific areas should concentrate on those areas. Collective intelligence from great minds will be enormously helpful--we will be digesting this and sending it on to relevant staffers and House membership.
An updated schedule and some more resources for our House Energy Bill project....
Posted by Prof. Goose on June 29, 2007 - 8:21am
Topic: Alternative energy
Tags: committee reports, energy, energy bill, house of representatives, oil, peak oil [list all tags]
If you don't know about our House Energy Project (HEP), check out this link first: http://www.theoildrum.com/node/2713 (please keep all of the comments on this topic in that thread...thanks.)
Under the fold is an updated schedule and lots more resources for you all to use for the HEP.
The House Energy Bill -- What You Can Do to Help Change Federal Energy Policy for the Better
Posted by Prof. Goose on June 25, 2007 - 8:45am
Topic: Alternative energy
Tags: committee reports, energy, energy bill, house of representatives, oil, peak oil [list all tags]
I have some homework for the readers of TOD, if you all are up for it. We need many pairs of eyes and excellent minds to contribute to a project that could be important for our democratic Republic.
Speaker Nancy Pelosi has more influence over what will make it into the House Energy Bill than any other Member. Under House procedure, the Rules Committee has the job of taking all of the energy-related bills approved by the various committees that have some jurisdiction over energy and combining them into one bill -- hundreds, if not thousands of pages with no time to consider the interaction of the pieces and parts.
A draft Energy bill will be released at a news conference perhaps on a coming Friday afternoon--we're not exactly sure when. By close of business the following Monday or Tuesday, proposed amendments to the bill have to be drafted into legislative language by Legislative Counsel and submitted by Members to the Rules Committee.
The next day or so after that, the Rules Committee will meet to consider which amendments are "in order" and will be allowed to have a 10 minute debate and a vote on the Floor. Any proposed amendments have to be "germane" -- the non-partisan Parliamentarian's office has to declare the amendment is related to narrowing or changing a specific provision already in the bill. If it's not related to something already in the bill, it's not germane. The Rules Committee is stacked with Members in a 9 to 5 ratio of Democratic Majority to Republican Minority. The Democrats are loyal to the Speaker, Republicans to Boehner, as it usually goes. So amendments that are politically undesirable to the Speaker and the Majority can also be denied a Floor vote.
Bottom Line -- There's a lot to do, lots of rules to follow and little time to do it. What The Oil Drum folks can do to help can be found under the fold.

k Nation (Jim Kunstler)


GAIA Host Collective